• Full Screen
  • Wide Screen
  • Narrow Screen
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
You are here: News & Events On the Research Front On The Research Front Alternative Model for the Origin and Evolution of Eusociality Suggested

Alternative Model for the Origin and Evolution of Eusociality Suggested

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 0

Chennai, December 27, 2011: Prof. James Hunt, presently at the North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA, writing about his research interests (see here), says: '... the worker and gyne castes among the brood of a Polistes colony are based on the underlying physiology of non-diapause and diapause as is found widely among insects. ... Polistes offspring do not "choose" to work in order to maximize their inclusive fitness. Instead they are products of their ontogeny combined with the social context into which they emerge, and their behaviors have the consequence of enhancing the fitness of the colony queen that laid the eggs that now are the larvae they care for. Inclusive fitness had nothing whatsoever to do with the origin of such sociality.'

Based on the investigations on molecular phylogeny and developmental biology of paper wasps, Hunt developed and proposed a conceptual model for the origin of eusociality in a review paper* published online in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Following is the Public Release dated November 19, 2011 in EurekAlert on this model.

*Reference cited: Hunt, J.H. 2012. A conceptual model for the origin of worker behaviour and adaptation of eusociality. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25 (1): 1-19. Published online on November 13, 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02421.x


EUREKALERT Public Release date: 16-Nov-2011

Contact: Robin Ann Smith, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , 919-668-4544, National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent)

Communal living of the insect kind

Durham, NC - The social lives of ants, wasps and bees have long been a puzzle to scientists. How did complex insect societies - colonies ruled by a queen and many workers - come to be? A new model adds to discontent with old ideas.

Social insect society is divided into specialized castes that take on different roles within the nest. Most of the members of a colony - the workers - forego their own chance for reproduction and instead spend their lives raising offspring that aren't their own. Generations of scientists have tried to understand why. In other words, "what's in it for the workers?" said author James Hunt, who developed his model while at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, NC.

The question continues to spark debate. For the past 40 years, the dominant answer was based on the idea that having kids of your own isn't the only way to pass on your genes. According to a theory called Hamilton's rule, proposed in 1964 by British biologist William Hamilton, sometimes helping a relative can spread more of your genes to the next generation than having kids of your own. When the benefits to a queen outweigh the costs to her workers, the theory goes, altruism can evolve.

But there's one thing Hamilton's rule fails to consider. "Direct benefit to the worker is not part of the equation," Hunt said. According to Hunt, the evolutionary beginnings of worker behavior may be more selfish than they seem.

He bases his ideas on more than three decades  of research on a family of wasps called the Vespidae, which is made up of nearly 5000 species. The majority of those species live alone, but some - such as hornets, yellowjackets, and paper wasps - live in complex societies with specialized castes that take on different tasks within the nest.

In paper wasps, for example, workers help build and defend the nest where they were born and feed and care for the larvae. By helping out around the nest, worker paper wasps are able to stock up on the food they need to eventually leave and lay eggs on their own, and the queen gets some babysitting help in return. "It's a situation of reciprocal exploitation," Hunt said.

Debates over how social behavior comes to be can be notoriously fierce in scientific circles. in recent years, a handful of studies have thrown Hamilton's rule into question, including a  2010 paper in the journal Nature that inspired dozens of scientists to write replies (see Carl Zimmer's article in The New York Times referred to below). Hunt's hypothesis says the 2010 study is basically correct, but it overplays the importance of genes.

Much of the debate stems from a failure to parse out key intermediate steps in the evolutionary transition from solitary to social, Hunt says. Paper wasps, for example, cooperate to care for young, but haven't yet evolved the distinct differences in appearance that characterize castes in the most highly social insects.

At these earliest stages, Hunt says, it doesn't matter whether workers and queens are related or not, or how many genes they share. The workers could be lingering around the nest simply because they're looking out for number one.

"The model that I'm putting forward proposes that at the very beginning of social behavior, the workers and the queens are both acting in their own self-interest," Hunt said.


For previous stories about this research and related work, read Zimmer, C. 2010. Scientists square off on evolutionary value of helping relatives. The New York Times dated August 30, 2010.